Now, to be honest this is a hard blog topic to write about because I stand on the fence about this subject. Before you read, please note that I am not an authority… I am simply a guy with an opinion. I have tagged graffiti in my past, I have friends that do it, I keep current with the scene and culture… etc. At the same time, I can see the properties of vandalism and why people despise graffiti, and as I have grown older I have come to respect that opinion.
To start this post, let us define the two terms:
According to Dictionary.com Art is defined as: (1)The quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance. (2)The class of objects subject to aesthetic criteria; works of art collectively, as paintings, sculptures, or drawings: a museum of art; an art collection. (to see the rest, click here.)
Also according to Dictionart.com Vandalism is defined as: (1)deliberately mischievous or malicious destruction or damage of property. (to see the rest, click here.)
I believe a big reason Graffiti is looked at in a negative light is because of the origins in modern day. Graffiti has been around for centuries (the Romans carved faces of disliked politicians into walls and statues.) But in the United States, the origins of graffiti began in the early 1920s with the famous “Killroy was here” pictures. As for the “pioneering era,” that was between the years of 1969-1974.
A guy named TAKI 183 started writing his graf all over the subways, and this started a trend and soon hundreds were following the trend. This became a competition. The goal of most artists at this point was “getting up”: having as many tags and bombs in as many places as possible. Artists began to break into subway yards in order to hit as many trains as they could with a lower risk, often creating larger elaborate pieces of art along the subway car sides. This is when the act of bombing was said to be officially established (early 1970s.)
Now, I could start writing a huge history… But not in this post. Basically what happened is gangs began to take over the scene and tagging became a gang right to claim territory and this led to violence. Also because of the cost to clean up graffiti, it became illegal, so these “artists” we vandals or criminals. They were all lumped into the category of bad people because of their illegal activities. This is when graffiti was labeled as vandalism.
Now I don’t disagree, in these early days of graffiti, it was indeed vandalism. It was not until the late 1980s-early 1990s that “burners” were developed and things began to change from vandalism to art. Burners are basically murals created, either tagging a name or depicting images that require time and artistic properties. People started seeing the time and appreciation, as well as the artistry it took to become a good graffiti artist. It became less like vandalism and more like art.
Now for my personal opinion, and the whole reason I wrote this article. In the graffiti scene there are rules believe it or not. The scene is not really gang related anymore, but has moved to artists who are out to show each other what they can do. It is not really for public appreciation, but more about getting recognized and respected in the graffiti community. People who run around and just write things to just write things are considered “toys” and that to me is vandalism.
There must be purpose and thought behind your work. There must be artistic properties. It must adhere to the definition of art: self expression. Burners and some throw-ups are considered art in my opinion. But, here is the catch… Art that is still vandalism. Thats right, it is both. Because it is still done on public property and can still offend some one out there. But there is no doubt that with the influence on culture and emergence of these artists actually getting paid for their work… Modern graffiti is art.
And to close while playing devil’s advocate. To quote one of my friends, “maybe the act of vandalism is indeed art as well, because to express ones self, vandalism is how they do it.”


Good post, I like that you added some history.
Thank you for taking the time to read my post Kendra.
I like to think that graff has transcended the gang culture it was originally associated with, gang stuff only seems to relate to certain places like LA. Other cities have a different attitude to graffiti, especially Italy, Spain and other parts of Europe. Maybe tagging still has links to gangs in some places but urban art is growing out of it I reckon, coming into it’s own.
Even tagging can show us some pretty amazing typography, people don’t recognise it cos it’s a pretty specialised thing to be into. Modern graff started by people saying bomb the system, f*ck everyone, it’s a reflection of the society people are in. Graff reflects society as it is at the moment.
I’ll shut up now! Peace!
I feel you man. I totally agree on your points. Like I said above, it is not much about gangs now as it is just kids “getting up.” And they do that not for the gangs or public, but for the art culture behind it… and that is why it is coming into it’s own.
Graff is having an impact for sure, and it is indeed art. Thanks for the comment.